I'm Chris. I work in technology. I can juggle two oranges with
one hand but not three with two. I have trouble finding shoes.
Hereunder, whatever I feel like. G-mail and IM: BoutofContext.
See also: Tumblr Backup/Filter Tool

Sep 08
Permalink
I’ve never seen a story that has a lead paragraph that says, ‘The president said this,’ and a second paragraph that says, ‘This is a lie.’ We just don’t have that kind of balls.
— Ben Bradlee in David Corn’s article “Note to Press: Get a Spine” (via mattlehrer)
Comments (View)
Sep 05
Permalink
I didn’t want to just roll in and top everyone posting 90’s vintage hip-hop and R&B vids today, but screw it. I’m all in with The Lady of the Rage featuring Snoop, Afro Puffs.
Comments (View)
Permalink
An end of summer Central Park phontograph for Friday.
An end of summer Central Park phontograph for Friday.
Comments (View)
Sep 04
Permalink Comments (View)
Sep 03
Permalink
mallisser asks:

Here’s something I don’t understand - why are there no “walk/don’t walk” lights on Park Avenue in midtown?
In order to know when it’s okay to walk you have to look at the traffic lights meant for vehicles…

The NYTimes reported last year on the atypical traffic lights and lack of pedestrian crossing lights along Park Ave in midtown, attributed to “a long-running feud between the city and Metro-North Railroad”:

The reason for the unusual configuration is that the avenue was built on a deck over the tracks that carry trains to and from Grand Central Terminal. The deck varies from about 18 to 24 inches thick, which is not deep enough to provide a foundation for traffic signal poles without breaking through the ceiling of the rail tunnel. Metro-North officials opposed any solution that would affect the tunnel ceiling.
“It was a jurisdictional issue,” said Sam Schwartz, who worked at the Transportation Department from 1982 to 1990. “We would have been puncturing the ceiling of the railroad. That’s where the battle ensued.” [More]

On a related note, I find traffic/crossing lights perform each other’s jobs better in NYC. Worried about timing green lights while driving? You’re better off looking for pedestrian lights paralleling the lane. They blink red seconds before vehicles get a yellow. Preparing a dash across the street before oncoming traffic’s green-lighted? The opposing traffic light’s yellow is your real final warning. Pedestrian lights err cautious relative to able-bodied youths.

mallisser asks:

Here’s something I don’t understand - why are there no “walk/don’t walk” lights on Park Avenue in midtown?

In order to know when it’s okay to walk you have to look at the traffic lights meant for vehicles…

The NYTimes reported last year on the atypical traffic lights and lack of pedestrian crossing lights along Park Ave in midtown, attributed to “a long-running feud between the city and Metro-North Railroad”:

The reason for the unusual configuration is that the avenue was built on a deck over the tracks that carry trains to and from Grand Central Terminal. The deck varies from about 18 to 24 inches thick, which is not deep enough to provide a foundation for traffic signal poles without breaking through the ceiling of the rail tunnel. Metro-North officials opposed any solution that would affect the tunnel ceiling.

“It was a jurisdictional issue,” said Sam Schwartz, who worked at the Transportation Department from 1982 to 1990. “We would have been puncturing the ceiling of the railroad. That’s where the battle ensued.” [More]

On a related note, I find traffic/crossing lights perform each other’s jobs better in NYC. Worried about timing green lights while driving? You’re better off looking for pedestrian lights paralleling the lane. They blink red seconds before vehicles get a yellow. Preparing a dash across the street before oncoming traffic’s green-lighted? The opposing traffic light’s yellow is your real final warning. Pedestrian lights err cautious relative to able-bodied youths.

Comments (View)
Permalink
The Republicans are running against Washington…Washington which they run. And they’re pulling it off!
— Pat Buchanan, on Republicans’ building up the ‘maverick’ brand of McCain/Palin.
Comments (View)
Sep 02
Permalink
By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services.
Be sure to read Chrome’s fine print | Webware : Cool Web apps for everyone - CNET (via rodtownsendjdel, soupsoup)

Funny, until this mentioned “the services,” I assumed it was Google’s master agreement for anyone putting anything on the Internet anywhere by any means. That, or an ad for robotstxt.org .
Comments (View)
Permalink Comments (View)
Aug 30
Permalink Comments (View)
Aug 29
Permalink
So, I’m in the back of a pickup with Bill Brasky Sarah Palin and a live deer! Well, Brasky Palin, she grabs the deer by the antlers, looks at it and says, “I’m Bill Brasky Sarah Palin! Say it!” Then she squeezes the deer in such a way that a sound comes out of its mouth - “Billbrasky! Sarahpalin!” It wasn’t exactly it, but it was pretty good for a deer!
Comments (View)
Aug 28
Permalink
Tell them about your dream, Martin!
— Mahalia Jackson, August 28, 1963, supposedly prompting Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. mid-speech, at the March on Washington to change his dark tone and deliver the ‘Dream’ riffs he’d used at previous events.
Comments (View)
Permalink

Missing Your Mark...et

On a stroll of lower Manhattan last night, I finally saw the sexy, black&gold monstrosity, William Beaver House; once summed by Gawker as “André Balazs’ vaguely vaginal condominium on William and Beaver streets.” Finally, since it had become my favorite misidentifying-your-target-audience anecdote, sight-unseen.

Balazs first pitched an ”R-rated marketing campaign featuring a martini-swilling beaver…and provocative, animé-style images of scantily clad men and women trading flirtatious glances.” [WSJ] After implying NYT’s Suzanne Slesin was too old for WBH, Calvin Tsao, whose firm designed it, described the building’s appeal “for a new generation that love living in hotel rooms…maybe not for families.” [See en suite, spa bed/bath, right.]

Instead, Balazs attracted “quite a mixed group” of buyers, many “not as young as I thought.” Less price-sensitive older singles, empty-nesters and even some families flocked to WBH and other luxury developments for the high-end, integrated amenities [parking, gym, common areas for entertaining, etc] despite the innuendo marketing. Apparently one part of the impending retirement crisis not mentioned by politicians is baby-boomer neighbors narcing on your party during quiet hours!

The advertising softened accordingly, but some risqué touches remain, including a demo of the ‘Beaver Butler’ bedroom cameras!

Comments (View)
Aug 27
Permalink
Illustration accompanying the Economist’s Behind America’s Shield: “The system is not fully proven”!
Illustration accompanying the Economist’s Behind America’s Shield: “The system is not fully proven”!
Comments (View)
Permalink Comments (View)
Aug 26
Permalink
Now, there is no thought or reverie. There is nothing but gossip and making plans to shop or watch television. The cellphone and the P.D.A. have basically replaced thought.
— Ben Stein, examining the technical ’chains with which we have bound ourselves,’ in Connected, Yes, But Hermetically Sealed.
Comments (View)